Recently in Carbon Offset Category

Paper has a long history of "grass" based feedstock -- think papyrus and even cotton!  Maybe it's time to rethink trees as the best natural resource for papermaking.  The chemicals used to convert wood into pulp requires enormous quantities of very caustic, very toxic chemicals. Green chemistry could be a way of exploring other fibers that require less chemicals and less toxic chemicals for the papermaking process.    

Canopy has launched an online survey to gather information that will help assess market interest in North America for papers made with agricultural residues.

Agricultural Residues such as Wheat Straw

"This study is the first of its kind in North America. Up until now, information about the market viability of non-wood paper has been anecdotal," says Neva Murtha, Second Harvest Campaigner with Canopy. "When done, we'll be able to translate demands for eco-paper into initiatives that help make straw papers a North American reality."

Straw Based Papers

Last year's successful trial of the Wheat Sheet issue of Canadian Geographic showed that non-wood papers pass the technical and quality requirements of the North American market. Also apparent during last year's trial was a significant level of interest by large paper consumers in agricultural residue paper alternatives such as the Wheat Sheet. With environmental concern on the rise, so is support for innovative business solutions that alleviate the stress on intact and endangered forests and the climate. Diversifying North America's paper fibre basket to include agricultural residues rather than carbon and species rich forests is one such solution that could also help ensure a secure supply of fibre for domestic producers.

Environmental Paper

This study is designed to help Canopy identify new and emerging opportunities for environmental paper. The survey will provide further information about what level of support exists for non-wood paper development in North America - a key element in new pulping capacity being developed in the US and Canada.

All survey input shall remain confidential and only used in aggregate numbers, unless otherwise approved by participating companies. Data collection will be targeted primarily at large paper consumers, such as publishers, printers, office retailers, and will capture data such as demand tonnage, priority grades, and how participants would like to engage in further stages of non-wood paper development.

To complete the survey about agricultural residue paper


For more information:
Canopy's work to build a market for agricultural residue papers, please visit their website.
For more information on the Wheat Sheet
CONTACT:
Neva Murtha, Second Harvest Campaigner
604-817-4974 | neva@canopyplanet.org 

Google's philanthropic arm, Google.org, recently unveiled new software that can actually track and monitor global deforestation. If the software becomes more widely implemented, it could serve as a useful tool in helping to cut carbon emissions and combat climate change.

Google.org worked with Greg Asner of the Carnegie Institution for Science and Carlos Souza of Imazon to develop the deforestation program. To evaluate deforestation in a certain area of the world, the software relies on past, present and future models of satellite image data. 

Handle computation in the cloud
What if we could offer scientists and tropical nations access to a high-performance satellite imagery-processing engine running online, in the "Google cloud"?

And what if we could gather together all of the earth's raw satellite imagery data -- petabytes of historical, present and future data -- and make it easily available on this platform?

Google decided to find out, by working with Greg and Carlos to re-implement their software online, on top of a prototype platform we've built that gives them easy access to terabytes of satellite imagery and thousands of computers in our data centers.

By processing a decades  of historical images, it is able to extract scientific information on how the size and shape of tree cover has changed over the years. Google hopes that by arming scientists and forest managers with this valuable data, they can better protect the world's forests.

Start with satellite imagery
Satellite imagery data can provide the foundation for measurement and monitoring of the world's forests. For example, in Google Earth today, you can fly to Rondonia, Brazil and easily observe the advancement of deforestation over time, from 1975 to 2001:

New Science Estimates Carbon Storage Potential of U.S. Lands
Nation's Forests and Soils Store Equivalent of 50 Years of U.S. CO2 Emissions

The first phase of a groundbreaking national assessment estimates that U.S. forests and soils could remove additional quantities of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere as a means to mitigate climate change.

The lower 48 states in the U.S. hypothetically have the potential to store an additional 3-7 billion metric tons of carbon in forests, if agricultural lands were to be used for planting forests.

This potential is equivalent to 2 to 4 years of America's current CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels.

"Carbon pollution is putting our world--and our way of life--in peril," said Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar in a keynote speech at the global conference on climate change in Copenhagen, Denmark.  "By restoring ecosystems and protecting certain areas from development, the U.S. can store more carbon in ways that enhance our stewardship of land and natural resources while reducing our contribution to global warming."

U.S. Geological Survey scientists also found that the conterminous U.S. presently stores 73 billion metric tons of carbon in soils and 17 billion metric tons in forests.

This is equivalent to more than 50 years of America's current CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels. This shows the need to protect existing carbon stores to prevent additional warming and future harm to ecosystems.

Habitat Carbon Absorption = 30% of Fuel Emissions

America's forests and soils are currently insufficient in soaking up the nation's accelerating pace of emissions. They currently absorb about 30 percent (0.5 billion metric tons of carbon) of the nation's fossil fuel emissions per year (1.6 billion metric tons of carbon). Enhancing the carbon storage capacity of America's and the world's ecosystems is an important tool to reduce carbon emissions and help ecosystems adapt to changing climate conditions.

Biologic carbon sequestration

"The tools the USGS is developing--and the technologies behind those tools--will be of great use to communities around the world that are making management decisions on carbon storage," said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. "The USGS is conducting a national assessment of biologic carbon sequestration, as well as an assessment of ecosystem carbon and greenhouse gas fluxes, which will help determine how we can reduce atmospheric CO2 levels while preserving other ecological functions."

To determine how much more carbon could be stored in forests and soils, USGS scientists analyzed maps that represent historical vegetation cover before human alterations, as well as maps of vegetation that might occur if there were no natural disturbances, such as fires, pests and drought. These maps were compared to maps of current vegetation and carbon storage.

The next phase of this work will assess the additional amount of carbon stored in Alaska's ecosystems, including its soils and forests. The USGS plans to collaborate with U.S. Department of Agriculture and other agencies to examine potential carbon storage in soils.

The USGS is conducting research on a number of other fronts related to carbon sequestration. These efforts include evaluating the potential for storing carbon dioxide in geologic formations below the Earth's surface, potential release of greenhouse gases from Arctic soils and permafrost, and mapping the distribution of rocks suitable for potential mineral sequestration efforts.

For more information about this assessment, visit http://pubs.usgs.gov/ofr/2009/1283.

Pacific Northwest temperate rainforests can attain the greatest biomass per acre of any ecosystem on earth.  Wow!  Did you know that?  I didn't.  Temperate and boreal forests are very extensive and currently serve as net carbon sinks.  And that's a good thing --  a very good thing!

Carbon storage by forests is complementary with other important ecosystem services provided by forests.

• Clean Water
• Fish and wildlife habitat
• Soil conservation
• Economic diversification
• Capture, storage and release of water, nutrients and sediment
• Air filtration
• Mediation of urban heat islands
  

Kyoto Protocols limited the credits given to established forests, but that approach to carbon sequestration and carbon offsets is changing.  Mature trees are storage tanks for high levels of carbon and particulates. 

The Athena Sustainable Materials Institute provides comparative  data for construction materials including wood, steel and concrete that takes a total energy use approach that includes total energy use, above grade energy use and CO2 emissions.   Wood is a superior material in this life-cycle inventory of large office building applications.

Carbon Dioxide in Forests

Tree growth sequesters considerable quantities of carbon:

• Dry wood is 49% carbon by weight
• For each pound of carbon stored, 3.7 pounds of carbon dioxide are removed from the atmosphere.
• For each pound of carbon stored, 2.7 pouds of oxygen are produced.
• Carbon is also stored in the soil, the litter, and in the trunks, branches, twigs, leaves, and roots of trees.

Trees also provide valuable habitat and food for biodiversity that converts plant matter into protein, which is vital for the animal kingdom.  Caterpillars and birds are key players in this highly productive food conversion process.

• Air filtration of regional pollutants

• Sequestration of carbon dioxide

• Restoration of soils

• Replenishment of underground fresh water storage and aqufers

• Reduction of mountainous flooding, and storage of snow pack for water supplies

• Habitat for wildlife and biodiversity preservation

• Outdoor recreation places and spaces

• Temperature moderation with moisture, shade and the cooling effects of solar absorption

Forestry Carbon Sequestration

Atmospheric carbon dioxide is a gas and forests play a role in its natural regulation.  CO2  - carbon dioxide -- is a gas that occurs naturally in the atmosphere, but it is also being produced with modern transportation and industry.  The result is an imbalance.

Sustainable forestry can hold sequestered carbon in its wood, leaves, root systems, and the soil fertility that results from natural decomposition of organic matters.  Sequestration is the scientific term used for a "storage tank".  Trees act as storage tanks for carbon dioxide by naturally absorbing carbon through photosynthesis.  As trees reach maturity, their growth rates slow depressing any new storage capacity.  Sustainably harvesting mature trees that have extremely slow sequestration rates is a way to keep carbon captured in woods that can be used in housing, furnishings and other long term applications.

Carbon Offset Credits

Sustainably manged forests can document their long term forestry management plan and keep an accurate inventory as the baseline for a sustainably managed, working forest.  These sustainable forests provide multiple benefits in the natural resources system.  In addition to producing carbon sequestering wood products, the working forest also filters ground water, controls erosion, restores soil quality, improves air quality by absorbing pollutants and carbon dioxide ... and provides recreational opportunities.

Carbon Credits

Carbon credits are an attempt by regional and national conservation economies to mitigate the growth of greenhouse gases.  Forests are a key player in the new carbon credits market.

Carbon trading is an emissions trading approach that lets companies buy sustainable credits to offset their not-so-environmentally friendly operations such as transportation or industrial production that uses fossil fuels and produces greenhouse gases.  By purchasing carbon credits to meet their legal compliance levels, these companies buy a little extra time to implement their own emissions reduction strategies.

Greenhouse gas emissions are capped by agencies such as the EPA as well as state based environmental and air quality agencies.  Markets are used to allocate the load of emissions among the group of regulated sources -- usually large manufacturing corporations. 

By having to purchase high priced carbon credits, compaies are encouraged to implement better, less expensive options that reduce their own emissions.  The more they succeed internally in reducing particulates and carbon dioxide, the fewer carbon credits they need to purchase to meet their compliance allocations.

Mitigation projects generate credits, so highly effective companies can sell their extra credits to generate revenue.  This income can be used to finance carbon reduction programs between partners and around the world. 

These carbon offset players can purchase credits from an investment fund or carbon development company that aggregates credits from approved, sustainable programs such as the Michigan Timber Conservation Carbon Off-Set Program.

Two current approaches to carbon reduction ar recognied as effective ways to reduce carbon emissions and climate change.  

Carbon offset credits consist of clean forms of energy production such as wind, solar, hydro and bio-fuels.

Carbon reduction credits consist of the collection and storage of carbon from the atmosphere through reforestation, forestation ocean and soil collection and storage processes.

Carbon Financial Instruments (CFI)

Forest owners who provide a sustainable, working forest can sequester carbon dioxide and offset current carbon levels through sustainably certified forest management and certified wood products.  The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) program is one example of sustainable forestry and product certification programs.

Carbon Offset Programs typically include forestry management strategies such as:

• land management portfolio
• complete forest inventory
• written management plan
• record keeping of all forest studies
• market driven carbon royalty payments
• aerial, land, and soil maps
• revenue from land tax credits
• using FSC certified harvesters
• ongoing forest analysis

 

Some of the benefits of participating in a sustainable forestry and offset program include:

• guaranteed market value of wood products
• sustainable forest recognition
• improved roi on timber products
• unlimited access to online forestry portal
• timber theft prevention program
• member referral program

The goal of sustainably harvested forests and timberland is a responsible, ethical business approach that promotes positive forestry growth and sequestration of carbon in wood products.  This is a promising approach to reducing greenhouse gas effects caused by environmental emissions and heat from urban, industrial, transportation and other sources of modern energy side effects.

If your private forest has harvestable, merchantable timber, you can still use your timberland for wood production as long as it is managed in a sustainable, planned, measured and long term way. 

Many regional sustainable forestry organizations, such as the Michigan Timber Conservation Carbon Off-Set Program, will help train and support landowners and forestry companies with management plans and a forest inventory to prepare the forest for carbon credit program participation.

In a 2008 report, the Governor's Minnesota Climate Change Advisory Group (MCCAG) recognized the importance of forests in greenhouse gas reduction by suggesting that nearly 30% of the state's 2025 greenhouse gas emission reduction goals could be achieved through forest management initiatives.

Forestry Carbon Credits help provide new funds for conservation. 

Princeton Biology and Public Policy Professor Lee Silver describes a vision (admittedly "sci-fi" for now) in which biotechnology has taken over the natural world--but in a responsible, sustainable way. He looks forward a potential distant future where, for example, trees are engineered to produce fuel.

"If you can imagine something," he says, "it's probably going to be done."

The bad boy of biotech has a vision... "we want to have renewable fuel... that doesn't affect the atmosphere. We want to maintain nature and forests...we love them. And we want to do it sustainably. Craig Venter wants to create organisms that are trees that produce diesel fuel...or some other source of energy. Sunlight is converted directly into fuel. That's what plants do...convert sunlight into energy...." (Craig Venter Received an EMC Information Leadership Award)

The forest provides comfort to us, the fuel is carbon neutral and the fuel is then used to create hydrogen fuel or some clean fuel. It's all dependent on manipulating the earth... like we've been doing for hundreds or thousands of years.

That's the future science fiction visionaries are seeing... biotech is the pathway through the forests of tomorrow.

Hmmmm....

A study of the magicians of the soil is an endless endeavor! Paul Stamets makes it a bit easier to learn about mushrooms with this TED talk. Mushrooms are both a citizen of the micro world of soil, but they are the manufacturers of the very soil in which they live. What a sentient approach to sustainability.

Protection of our natural resources in becoming increasingly dependent on careful monitoring, data collection and interpretation of these observations of how our world works.  The AmeriFlux network provides scientific development of methods as well as gathering and analysis of ecosystem data. These scientists quantify and advance understanding of processes regulating carbon assimilation, respiration, and storage, and linkages between carbon, water, energy and nitrogen through measurements and modeling.

The AmeriFlux network includes more than 120 independently funded sites operating across North, Central, and South America. AmeriFlux sites include tundra, grassland, agricultural crops, tropical forests and temperate coniferous and deciduous forests.

Nations of the world face challenges in developing sound policies and directions for addressing global change. The scientific community has the responsibility to provide the scientific basis for those policies.

This includes developing the understanding of the influence of land, ocean and atmospheric processes in climate change.

The goal of AmeriFlux is to develop a coordinated research network of long-term flux sites in the Americas for quantifying and understanding the role of the terrestrial biosphere in global climate change. Specifically, Ameriflux aims to provide reliable estimates of carbon storage, carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange, and improve our description and understanding of variation, and its causes at relevant temporal and spatial scales. We expect to provide the quantitative information to adequately predict large-scale long-term responses to changing environmental conditions.

This will be accomplished using micrometeorological and biological measurements at the intensive flux sites coupled with extensive measurements (e.g. surveys and remote sensing) and modeling.

The AmeriFlux network was established in 1996. The network provides continuous observations of ecosystem level exchanges of CO₂, water, energy and momentum spanning diurnal, synoptic, seasonal, and interannual time scales and is currently composed of sites from North America, Central America, and South America.

AmeriFlux is part of a "network of regional networks" (FLUXNET) which coordinates regional and global analysis of observations from micrometeorological tower sites. Learn more about FLUXNET and other regional carbon flux networks.

The network role is to address the scientific uncertainties associated with global change. AmeriFlux' focus is to address these scientific questions:

1. What are the magnitudes of carbon storage and the exchanges of energy, CO₂ and water vapor in terrestrial systems? What is the spatial and temporal variability?


2. How is this variability influenced by vegetation type, phenology, changes in land use, management, and disturbance history, and what is the relative effect of these factors?


3. What is the causal link between climate and the exchanges of energy, CO₂ and water vapor for major vegetation types, and how does seasonal and inter-annual climate variability and anomalies influence fluxes?


4. What is the spatial and temporal variation of boundary layer CO₂ concentrations, and how does this vary with topography, climatic zone and vegetation?

Recommendations for enhanced instrumentation at research sites

• Aspirated temperature. The AmeriFlux network needs to ensure temperature measurements are unbiased and stable with time
• Net Radiation. All sites should consistently use aspirators and account for any wind-speed corrections in their radiation measurements.
• Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density (PPFD) and incident radiation.
• Sonic Anemometry. There is no model of sonic anemometer-thermometers (SATs) that is ideal for all situations. Model type should be chosen by the site PI to best suit the site conditions and overall research questions.Scalar density measurements for CO2 and H2O. Precise scalar concentrations are needed to quantify the high frequency turbulent fluctuations of scalar density in making flux measurementsProfile systems. Because any 30-min scalar flux is the sum of both turbulent exchange and the vertical integrated rate of change of the scalar, it is important to have a CO2 profile system particularly at sites that have a developed canopy > 1 m in height.
• Soil respiration. Automated continuous measurements of soil respiration, and accompanying spatial representation with portable chambers, plus soil temperature and moisture profiles should be added to Tier 1 sites, and possibly some Tier 2 sites. We have found that automated chamber measurements of soil respiration (hourly)Water budget components. One key AmeriFlux objective is to explain the processes that control the fluxes of water vapor, and to determine how water vapor flux temporally and spatially affect the exchange of carbon (AmeriFlux Science Plan).
• Reporting calibration records (metadata) and data quality flags (for each 30-min period) in a centralized data repository (i.e., CDIAC) should also be explored to enhance overall network data quality